KD-ADS: Expanding Horizons

Cos thinking should never be stagnant...

Wednesday, May 26, 2004

A Thinking Fear

Certainly one may say, ‘Freedom to speak or write can be taken from us by a superior power, but never the freedom to think!’ But how much, and how correctly, would we think if we did not think, as it were, in common with others, with whom we mutually communicate!

Immanuel Kant
Critique of Practical Reason


Today a paralyzing fear gripped me in the afternoon. While I wish it was due to not updating my blog for a week, the reason for the sudden tang of this fienish fear had to do with my reticient acknowledgement that I would soon leave my current residence and return to my home country. It was an ineffable feeling, I was overwhelmed with irate anger, rage, sadness, melancholy and especially hatred that I must return to a place that I could no longer bear living in. I sought for the reasons for why this is so, controlling my querulous disposition to vituperate SP21, and to search for the verity of my reluctance. As I sat down to write vociferously about my intense fear, I then realised that a recent seminar accosted the tension within me. It was a seminar on "What is thinking for?", featuring two philosophy authors in conversation, Alain de Botten and John Armstrong.

1) Thinking helps refine our self-knowledge. Unlike hunger, our self-beliefs and values are not as precise and immediate. They can't be detected as readily unlike when we experience a hunger pang, where we know what we want to eat. Thinking focuses on our internal dialogue, and reaffirms our priorities and values in life.

2) Thinking helps identify ourself within our social environment, peers, family and external world. We are bombarded with a plethora of conflicting excessive information from our external surroundings, that to encounter and wade through this sensory overload is a daunting vexing task. Thinking is our cognitive tool to abscond from the torrent of assaulting information, and to position ourself in this revolving stormy world.

3) Thinking reduces our fear. We hear the common phrase, "you got nothing to fear but fear itself" which we should deconstruct. Fear is the representation of our emotion in reacting to uncertain, inconsistant or an unknown stimuli. We fear for our "future" because we can't predict the future, and we fear our "own selves" sometimes because we aren't sure of what we want or need. Thinking resolves and ameliorates our morose disposition to the portentous events of our life, it reduces doubts and constructs confidence in its place.

4) Thinking alleviates loneliness. The normality of life can be threatening to our internal states, while we no doubt desire for our own seclusion from the obfuscating world, we also panick over the ostentatious soundness of a routine lifestyle. We may be said to have a proclivity for vivaciousness, and thinking, as an antecedent, creates a congruous reception to other people's thoughts which align with ours. Thinking is a cure to the disease of "loneliness", as it reconnects our social needs with the discursive thoughts of others.

I was afraid that my return to SP21, in a word, would obliterate my freedom to think and express my thoughts. It is like a decree to stop "thinking". Thinking would be abysmal, it would only breed ignorance and regurgitate orthodox "truths". I was afraid that my adventure in thinking, not just by myself but with others who cherish the gifts of catholic thinking and rejection of parochial mindsets, would end, rendering a cessation in an utmost prudential task of human well-being. It is only with an incontrovertible tenacity to overcome social barriers that I must continue my quest.

7 Comments:

  • At 8:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At 12:57 PM, Blogger Douglas Evans said…

    Heh, I never said that my blog was intended as an English-language perfection course.

     
  • At 12:58 PM, Blogger Douglas Evans said…

    Accidentally deleted the post above, here's what Shermie said:

    Anonymous said...
    ghey facker!
    you and your rhetoric!!! ... which suddenly seems lacking now that i actually study the stratagem beneath your writing. Don't use "ineffable" in the same sentence as "irate".

    As if I know what I'm talking about, but maybe I do. Graduating in a week! English Literature hahaha. Stick your politics! The politics of language pwns j00 all!

    communic8 / failure

    use new tools /+ broken language

    --- :p @_@ ;_; Shermie

     
  • At 11:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Several novels and movies such as The Handsmaid Tale, 1984 (and to an extent Brazil) write about the similar Dystopian image you presented, where the main protagonist's only freedom is through escaping through one's mind since it is the only private arena domain where the government cannot intrude. But then again, the endings in 1984 and Brazil suggests ending scenarios where the government finally takes down an individual's mental will.

    And just a few weeks ago there was an article on a detector test that could "read" one's brain patterns to determine whether you had formerly commited a crime or not. At this rate, the mind as the last frontier to escape to may not even be safe...

    Fat Cat Lim

     
  • At 6:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Thank you!
    [url=http://ysfwwgqj.com/pkgm/bjrr.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://edohxmka.com/hznk/nszu.html]Cool site[/url]

     
  • At 6:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

  • At 6:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Nice site!
    http://ysfwwgqj.com/pkgm/bjrr.html | http://hgdclbsr.com/turh/vcfx.html

     

Post a Comment

<< Home